spacex launch cost comparison

The space race led to great technological advances, but these innovations came at a high cost. [64][65] In 2019, Blue was not only competing to offer the New Glenn launch vehicle for the US military's multi-year block-buy contract for "all [US] national security launches from 2022 to 2026" against SpaceX, ULA (for which Blue is on contract to provide the BE-4 engines for the ULA Vulcan), and others, it had "said the Air Force competition was designed to unfairly benefit ULA. SpaceX: . "[77], The Starship is planned to replace the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launch vehicles, as well as the Dragon spacecraft, initially aiming at the Earth-orbit launch market, but explicitly adding substantial capability to support long-duration spaceflight in the cislunar and Mars mission environments. Many space launch providers are expending capital to develop new lower-cost reusable spaceflight technologies. All rights reserved. Eutelsat CEO Michel de Rosen said, in reference to ESA's program to develop the Ariane 6, "Each year that passes will see SpaceX advance, gain market share and further reduce its costs through economies of scale. Addresses domestic and international security concerns in space. But CNBC noted in 2020 that the United States Air Force contracts paid around $95 million per Falcon 9 launch. . [C]onsiderable efforts to restore competitiveness in price of the existing European launcher need to be undertaken if Europe is [to] maintain its market situation. Within the US, as late as 2006, the high cost structures built in to government contractors'Boeing's Delta IV and Lockheed Martin's Atlas Vlaunch vehicles left little commercial opportunity for US launch service providers but considerable opportunity for low-cost Russian boosters based on leftover Cold War military missile technology. For a suborbital trip on Virgin Galactic's SpaceShipTwo and Blue Origin's New Shepard, seats typically cost $250,000 to $500,000. . If one of the payload providers for a multi-payload launch is not ready on time, Blue Origin will hold to the launch timeframe, and fly the remaining payloads on time at no increase in price. This page was last edited on 13 February 2023, at 13:32. Search for primary source documents from the history of aerospace policy. To compare, NASA's Space Launch System (SLS) will cost an estimated $2 billion per launch for similar missions. So this information will be a subject to availability for various reasons. When the contracts for the Commercial Crew Program were awarded in 2014, Boeing received the lion's share, slightly more than 60 percent of the $6.8 billion NASA awarded, getting $4.2 billion . [83], Before 2014, Arianespace had dominated the commercial launch market for many years. With frequent recovery of first-stage boosters by SpaceX, expendable missions had become a rare occurrence for them. It's clear that ULA's rocket can't even compete with SpaceX's current rocket; it will fall far behind when Starship comes online. By comparison, the liftoff thrust of the Falcon Heavy equals approximately eighteen 747 aircraft at full power. [75][needs update], In the first quarter of 2020, SpaceX launched over 61,000kg (134,000lb) of payload mass to orbit while all Chinese, European, and Russian launchers placed approximately 21,000kg (46,000lb), 16,000kg (35,000lb) and 13,000kg (29,000lb) in orbit, respectively, with all other launch providers launching approximately 15,000kg (33,000lb). The maximum payload capacity to LEO for a space launch vehicle is simply the highest mass capacity reported by a launch provider. It is important to remember that small-lift launchers are never . 2011: Only 17 geostationary commercial satellites went under contract during 2011 as an "historically large capital spending surge by the biggest satellite fleet operators" began to tail off, something that had been anticipated to follow the various satellite fleets being substantially upgraded. All adjustments for inflation in this data repository are made using the GDP Chained Price Index published by the Office of Management and Budget in Historical Table 10.1. This move further strengthens SpaceXs competitiveness in the commercial launch market. The Falcon 9 rocket would cost roughly $62 million to launch, while the Falcon . In those cases, the reported cost-per-kilogram figure is calculated by the, includes all direct and indirect manufacturing costs and their associated overhead plus recurring engineering, sustaining tooling, and quality control., Unit flyaway cost often includes [a]llowances or allocations to cover system and program management, software and other engineering changes and their associated test, and nonrecurring tooling, manufacturing, and engineering.. SpaceX designs, manufactures and launches advanced rockets and spacecraft. Reusable Falcon 9s [were project to potentially decrease] the price by an order of magnitude, sparking more space-based enterprise, which in turn would drop the cost of access to space still further through economies of scale. [70], SpaceX stated in 2014 that if they were successful at developing the reusable technology, launch prices in the US$5 to 7 million range for the reusable Falcon 9 could be achieved in the longer term. To date, the company claims that Falcon 9 first stage can be reused from 5 to 10 times, which significantly reduces launch costs. [13], Since the early 2010s, new private options for obtaining spaceflight services emerged, bringing substantial price pressure into the existing market. [90][needs update] ULAafter having held a government-sanctioned monopoly on US military launches for the previous decadedeclined to even submit a bid, leaving the likely contract award winner to be SpaceX, the only other domestic US provider of launch services to be certified as usable by the US military. [102] Russia may be the first launch provider to be a casualty of over supply of launch services. The Sun has about 5,000 million more years before it reaches its red giant stage, but when that happens, it will likely expand to the point where it swallows up the Earth. On December 21, 2021, SpaceXs Falcon 9 rocket launched a cargo capsule to deliver supplies and Christmas gifts to astronauts in the International Space Station. Explore fundamental concepts in the air and space domains. Blue Origin's Jeff Bezos initially said they did not plan to compete for the US military launch market, stating the market is "a relatively small number of flights. The money for the space industry [had been] secure and did not encourage risk-taking in the development of new space technologies. In this data repository, the number of successful orbital launches includes all launches before December 31, 2019. Today, a SpaceX rocket launching can be 97% cheaper than a Russian Soyuz ride cost in the 60s. And probably the most phenomenal aspect is its launch cost; estimated at $250 million per launch, Starship could cost 10 times less than the SLS per mission. [107][106]), In addition to building new launch vehicles and endeavoring to lower launch prices, competitive responses may include new product offerings, and now do include a more schedule-oriented launch cadence for dual-manifested payloads on offer from Blue Origin. [7] But the new landscape did not come without a cost. "Cubesats that used to cost US$350,000400,000 to launch are now US$250,000 and going down. Given Electron's unprecedentedly low launch cost ($4.5-6 million), we can expect that the Rocket Lab Neutron will significantly outperform Falcon 9 and SpaceX Heavy with their launch costs of $60 and $90 million, respectively. A Project of the Center for Strategic and International Studies. [43] In early 2016, Arianespace was projecting a launch price of 90100 million, about one-half of the 2015 Ariane 5 per launch price. The SpaceX Falcon Heavy launch from the Kennedy Space Center, on Feb 6, 2018. . United Launch Alliance, SpaceXs chief competitor for defense missions, regularly conducts around a dozen or more launches per year, but the Boeing-Lockheed Martin joint venture has only performed four missions through mid-year 2017. "[114], Early information in 2015 on the Starlink constellation of 4000 satellites operated by SpaceX intended to provide global Internet services, along with a new factory dedicated to manufacturing low-cost smallsat satellites, indicate that the satellite manufacturing industry may "experience a supply shock similar to what the launcher industry is experiencing" in the 2010s. [7], By 2018, the monopoly ULA had held on US national security space launch was over. This was augmented by collaboration with affiliated design bureaus in the USSR and contracts with commercial companies in the US. Just in: #SpaceX and #ULA have been awarded launch contracts by the US Air Force as part of the NSSL Phase 2 solicitation. But launch services aren't produce, and the conventional way of assessing launch costs on a dollars-per-kilogram basis isn't a good measure of the cost of launch. [39] And by 2019, ULA, with their next-generation, lower-cost Vulcan/Centaur launch vehicle, was one of four launch companies competing for the US military's multi-year block-buy contract for 20222026 against SpaceX (Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy), Northrop Grumman (Omega), and Blue Origin (New Glenn), where only the SpaceX vehicles are currently flying and the other three are all slated to make their initial launch in 2021. Due to these discrepancies, the data source is provided in the interactive chart on a vehicle-by-vehicle basis. [108], In June 2019, the European Commission provided funding for a three-year project called RETALT to "[copy the] retro-propulsive engine firing technique used by SpaceX to land its Falcon 9 rocket first stages back on land and on autonomous drone ships." [108] Below are the stats on how the two rockets compare. . SpaceX rocket boosters usually return to Earth in good enough condition that theyre able to be refurbished, which saves money and helps the company undercut competitors prices. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk revealed that his company's Starship rocket will only require $900,000 of fuel per launch and cost $2 million per mission overall. However, if you go deeper . In a stars early stages, its powered by hydrogen. Payloads manufacturing is where good money can be made. SpaceX's . Retail Investors Most Popular Stocks of 2023 So Far, Consumer Price Inflation, by Type of Good or Service (2000-2022), Mapped: Unemployment Forecasts, by Country in 2023, Decoding Googles AI Ambitions (and Anxiety), Ranked: Americas 20 Biggest Tech Layoffs Since 2020, Infographic: Generative AI Explained by AI, Infographic: 11 Tech Trends to Watch in 2023, Ranked: The Top 50 Most Visited Websites in the World, Visualized: The Most (and Least) Expensive Cities to Live In, Visualizing $65 Trillion in Hidden Dollar Debt, Visualizing the Relationship Between Cancer and Lifespan, Visualizing How COVID-19 Antiviral Pills and Vaccines Work at the Cellular Level, Mapped: The Most Common Illicit Drugs in the World. Cubesat launches that had previously cost US$350400 thousand had declined by March 2018 to US$250 thousand, and prices were continuing to decline. driving down launch costs by . ", "SpaceX Says Falcon 9 To Compete For EELV This Year", "China to Hold Long March Pricing Steady", "Satellite Operators Press ESA for Reduction in Ariane Launch Costs", "Evolution of a Plan: ULA Execs Spell Out Logic Behind Vulcan Design Choices", "European satellite chief says industry faces challenges", "Eutelsat Orders All-electric Satellite; Pledges to Limit Capital Spending", "ESA Members Agree To Build Ariane 6, Fund Station Through 2017", "ULA plans new rocket, restructuring to cut launch costs in half", "Congress OKs bill banning purchases of Russian-made rocket engines", "Europe's Satellite Operators Urge Swift Development of Ariane 6", "Tough Sledding for Proposed ESA Reorganization", "Lockheed-Boeing rocket venture needs commercial orders to survive", "SpaceX may upset firm's monopoly in launching Air Force satellites", "Air Force's Space and Missile Systems Center Certifies SpaceX for National Security Space Missions", "Increased competition will challenge ESA's space authority", "NBN launcher Arianespace to cut jobs and costs to fight SpaceX", "SpaceX says reusable stage could cut prices 30 percent, plans November Falcon Heavy debut", "SpaceX gaining substantial cost savings from reused Falcon 9", "Russia's Proton rocket, which predates Apollo, will finally stop flying Technical problems, rise of SpaceX are contributing factors", "SpaceX Caps Record 2018 With Launch of Air Force GPS Satellite", "Falcon 9 launches cargo Dragon, lands 100th booster [webcast]", "VCs Invested More in Space Startups Last Year Than in the Previous 15 Years Combined", "Space race 2.0 sucks in $US10b from private companies", "Rocket reusability: a driver of economic growth", "SpaceX advances drive for Mars rocket via Raptor power", "ULA's parent companies still support Vulcan with caution", "ULA's Vulcan Rocket To be Rolled out in Stages", "The fate of United Launch Alliance and its Vulcan rocket may lie with Congress", "Desire for Competitive Ariane 6 Nudges ESA Toward Compromise in Funding Dispute with Contractor", "Airbus Safran Agrees to $440 Million Ariane 6 Contribution", "Private-sector rocket launch legislation eyed", "Space is about to get a whole lot more accessible and potentially profitable", "ULA To Invest in Blue Origin Engine as RD-180 Replacement", "ULA's Tory Bruno Vows To Transform Company", "Tom Tshudy, ULA: with Vulcan we plan to maintain reliability and on-time performance of our existing rockets, but at a very affordable price. The four percent stake isnt worth the effort to try to elbow Musk and China aside. SpaceX's Demo-2 launch of NASA astronauts on Saturday . and India's ISRO[2]also financed the indigenous development of their own national designs. Walter E. Hammond, Space Transportation: a Systems Approach to Analysis and Design (Reston: AIAA, 1999), 407, https://doi.org/10.2514/4.862380. The low launch prices offered by the company,[23] especially for communication satellites flying to geostationary (GTO) orbit, resulted in market pressure on its competitors to lower their prices. The European Space Agency (ESA) was formed in 1975, largely following the same model of space technology development. The stated design objective was to reduce both the cost and duration of reusable vehicle refurbishment and was partially motivated by the pressure of lower-cost competitive options with newer technological capabilities not found in the Ariane 6. Most critically, the very definition of launch cost is subject to interpretation. [53] It was unclear how the change in development funding mechanisms might change ULA plans for pricing market-driven launch services. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Surplus Missile Motors: Sale Price Drives Potential Effects on DOD and Commercial Launch Providers, August 2017, https://www.gao.gov/assets/690/686613.pdf. And Orbital ATK wants to build an Atlas V replacement . The results are clear in a statistical analysis of NASA and SpaceX projects. Here's how SpaceX, Blue Origin, and NASA's newest rockets compare. And while we havent figured out all the answers quite yet, weve made some remarkable discoveries when it comes to learning about outer space. In many cases, space launches are arranged through private or classified contracts.1 In other cases, launch providers may provide costs for a single configuration of a launch vehicle, despite offering a wide range of variants of the vehicle to potential customers with vastly different capabilities.2 Most critically, the very definition of launch cost is subject to interpretation. ULA intended to have preliminary design ideas in place for a blending of the Atlas V and Delta IV technology by the end of 2014,[32][61] but in the event, the high-level design was announced in April 2015. SpaceX indicated in 2017 that the single-launch marginal cost of the Starship would be approximately US$7 million. But as light from distant objects millions of light-years away takes a long time to reach us here on Earth, the largest of stars shine for hundreds of millions of years after they die. One of the reasons given for the restructuring and new cost reduction goals was competition from SpaceX. The Saturn V cost $185 million per launch at the time, or about $1.25 billion in today's money, because each rocket was single-use. If the same space launch vehicle were to support a different mission to LEO, such as one that requires a higher altitude or inclination, the payload capacity would be reduced. We all feel challenged by what the Internet companies are doing. This data repository compares costs between space launch vehicles by incorporating many vehicle characteristics into a single figure: the cost to launch one kilogram of payload mass to low Earth orbit (LEO) as part of a dedicated launch. Mapped: Europes Biggest Sources of Electricity by Country, Visualizing the Scale of Global Fossil Fuel Production, Visualizing U.S. The big cheese at Roscosmos has claimed a launch to the International Space Station using good ol' fashioned Russian Soyuz rockets still costs less than SpaceX's offering. Hover over the Heavy, Medium, or Small buttons in the charts legend to view launch vehicles of a particular payload mass class. This detailed map highlights 200+ celestial objects that astronomers have discovered about our universe and provides facts about each one. [29], In August 2014, Eutelsat, the third-largest fixed satellite services operator worldwide by revenue, indicated that it planned to spend approximately 100 million less each year in the next three years, due to lower prices for launch services and by transitioning their commsats to electric propulsion. However, SpaceX attributed their cost efficiencies to a few primary factors. Last week, the US space agency tapped the company's Falcon Heavy rocket . "[99], Following a SpaceX launch vehicle failure in June 2015due to the lower prices, increased flexibility for partial-payload launches of the Ariane heavy lifter, and decreased cost of operations of the ESA Guiana Space Center spaceportArianespace regained the competitive lead in commercial launch contracts signed in 2015. By early 2016, the US Air Force had committed US$201 million of funding for Vulcan development. Market dynamics in satellite launch industry, 1970s and 1980s: Commercial satellites emerge, 2010-2020s: Competition and pricing pressure, First launch of the competitive PSLV-CA and PSLV-XL versions (2007 and 2008), Excluding two demo flights of Kuaizhou-1 version in 2013 and 2014, Atlas + Delta excluding military missions and GPS; Dnepr, Rokot, Zenit, Competition for the American heavy-lift market, Launch industry response - to lower prices - from 2014, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, first launch to a geostationary transfer orbit, first successful landing and recovery of a SpaceX Falcon 9 first stage in December 2015, successful recovery of a first stage rocket in December 2015, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14777622.2016.1244877, "ULA bows out of Pentagon launch competition, paving way for SpaceX", "ULA intends to lower its costs, and raise its cool, to compete with SpaceX", "Four rocket companies are competing for Air Force funding, and it is war", "To stay competitive in the launch business, ULA courts commercial customers", "SpaceX crests double-digit marker, notching tenth launch this year", "Elon Musk spent $1 billion developing SpaceX's reusable rockets here's how fast he might recoup it all", "As private companies erode government's hold on space travel, NASA looks to open a new frontier", "How did private companies get involved in space? [26] Continuing to face "stiff competition on price",[13] in April seven European satellite operator companiesincluding the four largest in the world by annual revenueasked that the ESA, "find immediate ways to reduce Ariane 5 rocket launch costs and, in the longer term, make the next-generation Ariane 6 vehicle more attractive for smaller telecommunications satellites. But the matter did not progress any further. [115], While vehicle launch cost is a metric utilized when comparing vehicles, the cost per lb/kg launched is also an important factor that is not always directly correlated with the overall launch vehicle cost. In then-year dollars, per-kilogram costs increased from 1957 to 2005 and generally decreased from 2005 to 2020. SpaceX has said that its smallsat customers taking part in rideshare missions can send payloads of either up to 330 lbs for as little as $2.25 million, or 660 lbs for just $4.5 million, which is a . A number of market responses to the increase of lower-cost competition in the space launch market began in the 2010s. SpaceX's goal is to build an entire fleet of Starships and launch multiple vehicles on a daily basis, at an average launch cost of $1 million or thereabouts. [94][failed verification], According to one Arianespace managing director in 2015, "'It's quite clear there's a very significant challenge coming from SpaceX,' he said. The management layoffs were the "beginning of a major reorganization and redesign" as ULA endeavors to "slash costs and hunt out new customers to ensure continued growth despite the rise of [SpaceX]". We may never find out. . to LEO for a space launch vehicle is simply the highest mass capacity reported by a launch provider. Published on: October 13, 2022. As a result, the emergence of SpaceX was a surprise to other launch providers "because the need to evolve launcher technology by a giant leap was not apparent to them. So, out of the three vehicles currently being used to bring NASA astronauts to the ISS, Crew Dragon is the cheapest and Starliner the most expensive, but not significantly more so than Soyuz. Special thanks to Mariel de la Garza for her work developing this tool. We encourage corrections, additions, and suggestions. In those cases, non-recurring costs, such as research and development, may be included as part of the figure. Still, "Arianespace remained confident it could maintain its 50% share of the space launch market despite SpaceX's slashing prices by building reliable rockets that are smaller and cheaper. After the mid-2010s, prices for smallsat and cubesat launch services began to decline significantly. SpaceX gets USSF-36 . For the new ESA launch vehicleAriane 6, aiming for flight in the 2020s400 million of development capital was requested to be "industry's share", ostensibly private capital. At the time, the engine was already in its third year of development by Blue Origin. [53] ULA had asked the US government in 2016 to provide a minimum of US$1.2 billion by 2020 to assist it in developing the new US launch vehicle. SpaceX show[ed] that technology has advanced sufficiently in the last 30 years to enable new, game changing approaches to space access. While stars emit energy for years, its important to note that they dont shine for eternity. which can cost up to $165 million. The usual approach is to compare launch costs per kilogram by dividing the total cost per flight by the maximum payload delivered to LEO. In 2014, United Launch Alliance (ULA) began a multi-year major restructuring of processes and workforce to decrease launch costs by half. The French finance minister, Bruno Le Maire said France intends to "have our SpaceX, we will have our Falcon 9. For example, in 2016, SpaceX launched a GPS 3 satellite for $83 million. SpaceXs successful recovery of a first stage rocket in December 2015 did not change the Arianespace outlook. D. E. Koelle, TRANSCOST, Statistical-Analytical Model for Cost Estimation and Economic Optimization of Space Transportation Systems, MBB Report No. During the last 60 years, roughly 600 people have flown into space, and the vast majority of them have been government astronauts. As of May2015[update], the Japanese legislature was considering legislation to provide a legal framework for private company spaceflight initiatives in Japan. [97] Airbus CEO Fabrice Bregier stated: "What is the weakness of a big group like Airbus when we talk about innovation? Geosynchronous orbit launches historically taking advantage of economies of scales with larger launch vehicles and greater use of the maximum payload capacity of a vehicle vs LEO launches.



46 Defense Weakness, Articles S