editor decision started nature rejection

(You are not allowed to say "Gamma" unless you give a shape and scale parameter). Wishing you the best of luck on your paper. [CDATA[> What does this mean and should I contact the editor? Unfortunately, as a freelancer, it comes with the job. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, Not the answer you're looking for? //-->Reviews for "Nature Communications" - Page 1 - SciRev Rejection, organisation and freedom: What it's really like being a The manuscript subject falls outside of the Aims and Scope of the selected journal or is not likely to be of interest to the readership of the selected journal. Decisions by editors are routinely made very rapidly after receipt of reports, and Nature offers an advance online publication (AOP) service to an increasing number of manuscripts. Most referees honour their prior agreement with Nature to deliver a report within seven days or other agreed time limit, and send their reports online. volume5,page 917 (2002)Cite this article. At times, they may ask you to revise and resubmit the manuscript. //-->Scott, Michael - Ancient Worlds_ A Global History of Antiquity | PDF Depending on the journal, you may even be offered to resubmit the manuscript . Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. If the authors feel that they have a strong scientific case for reconsideration (if the referees have missed the point of the paper, for example) they can appeal the decision in writing. If rejection follows a long review process, it can be especially disappointing. After a paper is accepted, it is subedited (copyedited) to ensure maximum clarity and reach, a process that enhances the value of papers in various ways. Your manuscript entitled "xxxxxxxxx" has now been seen again by our original reviewers, whose comments are appended below. Manuscript Status Tables Part 2 - Notes from the JGR-Space Physics The Senior Editor then assesses the manuscript for its quality and perceived level of advance and then either recommends a reject decision or assigns peer reviewers. Editors will not send resubmitted papers to the reviewers if it seems that the authors have not made a serious attempt to address all the referees criticisms. We understand your anxiety :-) However, the decision on manuscript acceptance depends on several factors, such as availability and responsiveness of peer reviewers and the extent of revisions recommended. You can email the site owner to let them know you were blocked. Editor Decision When making a decision, we expect that the academic editor checks the following: The suitability of selected reviewers; Adequacy of reviewer comments and author response; Overall scientific quality of the paper. The first stage for a newly submitted Article is that the editorial staff consider whether to send it for peer-review. //--> How do I align things in the following tabular environment? 2. The Cambridge Grammar Of The English Language [PDF] [39mcl5ibdiu0] How do I write an inquiry to the editor about my manuscript's current status? Cloudflare Ray ID: 7a2b13d3eec43de7 See this document for a full description of what happens after acceptance and before publication. Dont infer anything from unavailable data. Will contact my PI if it doesn't change to "decision sent to author" in the next few days. on 05 Apr, 2021. To obtain Nature (journal) - Wikipedia Got lab stories? Deciding when or whether you should write a rebuttal, determining what steps you should take next if you choose the . How to proceed? What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? How did it go for you after this? We suggest that authors send proofs to co-authors for them to check, but request that changes among the co-authors are coordinated so that only one author communicates with Nature and only one set of corrections is sent. If the reviewers wish to be named their names will appear in alphabetical order at the end of the paper in a statement as below: Any reviewers that wish to remain anonymous will be acknowledged using a slightly modified statement: If no reviewers agree to be named, we will still acknowledge their valuable service using the statement below: Nature makes decisions about submitted papers as rapidly as possible. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. The action you just performed triggered the security solution. Nature editors will normally honour requests that a paper not be sent to one or two (but no more) competing groups for review. Authors are understandably motivated to dispute rejections; scientists are evaluated on their publication record, and even if their own positions are secure, senior authors feel a responsibility to promote the professional advancement of their students. Even if the reviewers give positive recommendations, the editor can decide to reject a paper. If a paper was considered insufficiently novel or interesting to merit high-profile publication, we are unlikely to reconsider simply because the authors disagree. It means the editor has actually received it and is reviewing. edit: so no. Usually they decide in less than a week after the initial submission. Reviewers will assess the technical soundness and scientific validity of your methods, analysis and interpretation, all of which must be appropriate, properly conducted, ethically robust and fully supported by the data. How to Appeal a Journal Decision - Elsevier Author Services Blog So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. For our last submission the decision took 25 days for which the editor apologized. We understand your anxiety :-) However, the decision on manuscript acceptance depends on several factors, such as availability and responsiveness of peer reviewers and the extent of revisions recommended. All Articles published in Nature go through at least one round of review, usually two or three, sometimes more. independence from the authors and their institutions, ability to evaluate the technical aspects of the paper fully and fairly, currently or recently assessing related submissions. Decisions by editors are routinely made very rapidly after receipt of reports, and Nature offers an advance online publication (AOP) service to an increasing number of manuscripts. This enables most queries to be resolved before proof stage. Revised papers should be accompanied by a point-by-point response to all the comments made by all the referees. [CDATA[// > New referees can often raise new sets of points, which complicates and lengthens the consideration process instead of simplifying it. However, when they communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision, it was decided to reconsider your manuscript. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience . [CDATA[// >